Opportunists Prey on Trayvon

The shooting death in Florida of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old African-American, is tragic.  However, the way Jessie Jackson, Sr. and Reverend Al Sharpton, both Baptist ministers and civil rights activists, have latched on to this tragedy is disgusting.  They are both using this young man’s death to further their agendas.

George Zimmerman, who was on a Neighbourhood Watch patrol, said he was attacked by Martin and that he shot him in self defense.  So far the evidence seems to support his claims; however, the matter is under investigation.  Mr. Zimmerman is now in hiding though, afraid for his life, because of the uproar contributed to (if not started by) these pastors.  Jessie Jackson has said “blacks are under attack” and that Treyvon was “murdered and martyred”.  They fail to mention, however, that most young black men who are murdered, are murdered by other young black men. Do these two very influential leaders want to cause a race war?  Is that their agenda?

The New Black Panther Party is offering a $10,000 reward for the “capture” of Zimmerman.  They are also distributing T-shirts calling Zimmerman a “Cracker”.  Since he is Hispanic, why would they do that? They are picking a fight, but their target is not the Hispanic community.

If blacks are under attack, it is other blacks that they need to be afraid of, according to one black man who contributed to a blog called “Booker Rising”.  He says, “Allow me to expose a very open secret.  The one of the reasons [sic] why most Blacks like you and me have made the decision to move away from the city and to the suburbs (where the White people are) is for the safety of our family.”   [these are his words, not mine]

With the economic climate being what it is in the U.S. right now, people might be ready for a fight.  Mr. Jackson and Mr. Sharpton better by careful, they might very well be poking a mad dog with a stick.

Feminism's Fight Against Nature

For all you young women out there who are conflicted with the “stay home or go back to work” dilemma after having children, I highly recommend a book called The Flipside of Feminism; What Conservative Women Know—and Men Can’t Say by Suzanne Venker and Phyllis Schlafly.  I do caution you to read it with an open mind, though, because it goes against everything feminists have been telling us--or I should say drilling into us--for the last few decades.  And even if you don’t consider yourself a feminist, their ideas have infiltrated all our lives.

A recent report by the National Bureau of Economic Research says “As women have gained more freedom, more education, and more power, they have become less happy.”  Why is that?  Is it because women try to have it all, a career and children, and find that while they can do both, they can’t do both well, at least not at the same time.  So maybe putting a career on hold for a few years until the children are in school isn’t such a bad idea--or better yet, for those who can, work from home.

I am certainly not saying that we should go back to the world of the 50’s (not a chance); however, I think it’s time for feminists to stop screaming inequality.  And I also think it’s time for society (led by feminists) to stop pressuring women to go back to work after having children.  If a family can manage it financially, then who better to be the care giver?

Radical feminists hate this book, of course, and they do not want you to read it.  They want women to think they are still oppressed.  There is a quote about feminists being a disagreeable bunch, and that “It’s impossible not to be bitter when you’re banging your head against the wall trying to keep the sun from rising.”  That is what radical feminists are doing in their quest for trying to make women think they are exactly like men.  They are not.

Feminism is a fight against nature.

Hysteria Over Child's Drawing

Imagine this scenario:  You are the father of a 4 year old girl who is in preschool or junior kindergarten.  Just like every other day, you go to the school to pick her up along with her siblings.  However, on one particular day, when you arrive at school, three police officers are there and they arrest you right in front of the school and all the other parents and children.  They take you to the police station, strip search you, and then put you in a cell to wait.  The charge is “possession of a firearm”—no other details.

Meanwhile, back at home, your wife (who happens to be pregnant) is picked up by the police and taken to the station for questioning, along with your four children. She is told the same thing “possession of a firearm” but no details.  Your home is searched while you and your family are gone and the police find what they are looking for—a gun.  The kicker is, it isn’t a real gun.  It’s a plastic toy.

The little four year old girl had drawn a picture of a man holding a gun.  When her teacher asked her about it she said her dad uses it to shoot bad guys and monsters.  So this teacher told the principal, the principal called social services, social services called the police, and so on, and so on.  At ANY point, did ANYONE think they might be overreacting?  Apparently not.

This happened in Waterloo, Ontario, a few days ago.  When this father finally got home after being held for four hours, his little girl said “Daddy, are you mad at me?”  The poor man, can you imagine how frightening this whole incident must have been for him and his family?

What is wrong with people?  Do they really think “better safe than sorry” justifies this? 

American Billionaires Manipulate Environmental Movement

Don’t believe them, they are lying to you!!!  I am talking about environmental groups who keep screaming about Canada’s oil sands.  They misquote studies, they exaggerate statistics, and generally make things up as they go along and the mainstream media quotes them as though it were the gospel.

Some of these environmental groups are being funded by American billionaires, such as the Rockefeller brothers, according to Vivian Krause, an independent blogger who has also written several articles for the National Post.   For the last five years, she has been researching the tax returns of several environmental organizations to find out where their money was coming from for their campaigns.  You can check her out at www.fair-questions.com.  As the old saying goes, “follow the money” and you might find some answers, which she did.

Her articles contain so much information that it is difficult to decide what to tell you.  However, she had first discovered that the B.C. farmed salmon companies had been greatly damaged by the campaigns launched by the Suzuki Foundation along with others which falsely claimed that PCB’s were extremely high in farmed salmon.  These campaigns according to Ms. Krause were financed by the same American billionaires.  However, she implies that their motives may be more economical than environmental.  The biggest beneficiary of the collapse of the B.C. farmed salmon industry was the Alaskan wild salmon industry, and she has proof that these same Americans are directly tied to the wild salmon industry.  Now they have set their sights on Canada’s oil sands and they are determined to stop the oil from flowing.  That would have catastrophic effects on the economy of this whole country. 

There is one foundation in particular named by Ms. Krause that my husband and I have contributed to in the past who will certainly not be receiving anything further from us in the future.  They have taken our money at their fund raisers all the while it seems they were scheming to take away our livelihood.  

Please pay attention people, they are lying to you.